Nobody Has More Respect for Women Than I Do

People rightly laughed at Trump when he claimed this in the 3rd debate this past week.  The thing is, I think the audience was laughing at the notion that Trump could respect women, when the real problem is what Trump thinks a woman is.

There are multiple definitions of respect, none of which strike me as problematic (these are the verbs; the noun versions are similar):

: to feel admiration for (someone or something) : to regard (someone or something) as being worthy of admiration because of good qualities

: to act in a way which shows that you are aware of (someone’s rights, wishes, etc.)

: to treat or deal with (something that is good or valuable) in a proper way

It is certainly plausible that Trump’s feelings towards women match the first and third definitions of respect here, provided we accept some rather retrograde definitions of the good qualities of women and what proper treatment of women entails.  I don’t think it would be terribly unexpected if Trump’s definition of “woman” meant that groping and grabbing were “treating and dealing with something that is good or valuable in a proper way”.  Likewise, regarding a woman not as a fellow homo sapien with mostly aligned priorities but as an unfathomably attractive but ultimately aesthetic object probably only deepens his offense at people lacking womanly qualities calling themselves that.  Metal fans aren’t just indifferent but morally revolted when Limp Bizkit fans (such as they exist) call their idols metal.

1280px-limp_bizkit_baltimore_2013
Disgusting slobs with fat ugly faces.

There are hints of this problem in the responses of Trump’s Republican (erstwhile) allies as well: Paul Ryan insisted that “Women are to be championed and revered, not objectified”, which certainly doesn’t sound like an attitude one takes towards people essentially like oneself.  Whether or not Ryan respects women isn’t the issue; it’s clear that he does.  He just thinks of a woman as something like a rare giant catfish or a goldtop Gibson Les Paul.

Living in Japan exposes you to this attitude a lot: People don’t think they’re being sexist in a disrespectful sense by having only men drive on the freeway or having women do all the housework.  They’re being completely respectful of what they think are the essential qualities of men and women.  A lack of respect isn’t the issue: if anything too much respect is exactly the problem.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Nobody Has More Respect for Women Than I Do

  1. Great parsing of the word “respect” in this context. I’d kind of just assumed that when Trump said that, he was just pandering slash compulsively lying. But perhaps, as you suggest, he really does believe that he has the greatest respect [definition 1 or 3] for women.

    In this vein, any thoughts on another laugh line, from debate one, where Trump declared “I think my strongest asset by far is my temperament. I have a winning temperament”?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks. I would’ve probably assumed the same except that it’s a pattern one sees often in chauvinists, that respecting category x’s essential nature as that category (and deriding members of that category who fail to display that essence) equals respecting the person. As for his temperament, I can’t find wiggle room in the definitions of those words to make it true, so I guess I’d just have to attribute that delusion to the self-selecting nature of his inner circle and those who choose to be around him. What do you think?

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I do think it’s telling that Trump uses the phrase “winning temperament.”

    Denotatively, “temperament” doesn’t mean what I think a lot of listeners were hearing. I think listeners laughed because they were equating “temperament” with being calm, cool, and collected (and because they equate “presidential temperament” with this meaning).

    In contrast, maybe Trump was genuinely saying that he thought his “usual attitude, mood or behavior” was his strongest asset. His phrase a “winning temperament” supports this. If, in his mind, he wasn’t claiming the ability to stay calm and collected, bur rather, the ability to bully, demean, and mislead others so as to achieve advantage for himself — winning — then it kind of makes sense.

    So, like the word “respect,” maybe the audience response to Trump’s use of the word “temperament” may reflect two different hearings of the word, two different worldviews — rather than simple pandering/lying/obliviousness.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s